15 results
Virtual reality (VR) therapy for patients with psychosis: satisfaction and side effects
- Daniel Freeman, Laina Rosebrock, Felicity Waite, Bao Sheng Loe, Thomas Kabir, Ariane Petit, Robert Dudley, Kate Chapman, Anthony Morrison, Eileen O'Regan, Charlotte Aynsworth, Julia Jones, Elizabeth Murphy, Rosie Powling, Heather Peel, Harry Walker, Rory Byrne, Jason Freeman, Aitor Rovira, Ushma Galal, Ly-Mee Yu, David M. Clark, Sinéad Lambe
-
- Journal:
- Psychological Medicine / Volume 53 / Issue 10 / July 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 28 April 2022, pp. 4373-4384
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Background
Automated virtual reality therapies are being developed to increase access to psychological interventions. We assessed the experience with one such therapy of patients diagnosed with psychosis, including satisfaction, side effects, and positive experiences of access to the technology. We tested whether side effects affected therapy.
MethodsIn a clinical trial 122 patients diagnosed with psychosis completed baseline measures of psychiatric symptoms, received gameChange VR therapy, and then completed a satisfaction questionnaire, the Oxford-VR Side Effects Checklist, and outcome measures.
Results79 (65.8%) patients were very satisfied with VR therapy, 37 (30.8%) were mostly satisfied, 3 (2.5%) were indifferent/mildly dissatisfied, and 1 (0.8%) person was quite dissatisfied. The most common side effects were: difficulties concentrating because of thinking about what might be happening in the room (n = 17, 14.2%); lasting headache (n = 10, 8.3%); and the headset causing feelings of panic (n = 9, 7.4%). Side effects formed three factors: difficulties concentrating when wearing a headset, feelings of panic using VR, and worries following VR. The occurrence of side effects was not associated with number of VR sessions, therapy outcomes, or psychiatric symptoms. Difficulties concentrating in VR were associated with slightly lower satisfaction. VR therapy provision and engagement made patients feel: proud (n = 99, 81.8%); valued (n = 97, 80.2%); and optimistic (n = 96, 79.3%).
ConclusionsPatients with psychosis were generally very positive towards the VR therapy, valued having the opportunity to try the technology, and experienced few adverse effects. Side effects did not significantly impact VR therapy. Patient experience of VR is likely to facilitate widespread adoption.
Understanding agoraphobic avoidance: the development of the Oxford Cognitions and Defences Questionnaire (O-CDQ)
- Laina Rosebrock, Sinéad Lambe, Sophie Mulhall, Ariane Petit, Bao S Loe, Simone Saidel, Maryam Pervez, Joanna Mitchell, Nisha Chauhan, Eloise Prouten, Cindy Chan, Charlotte Aynsworth, Elizabeth Murphy, Julia Jones, Rosie Powling, Kate Chapman, Robert Dudley, Anthony Morrison, Eileen O’Regan, David M Clark, Felicity Waite, Daniel Freeman
-
- Journal:
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy / Volume 50 / Issue 3 / May 2022
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 15 February 2022, pp. 257-268
- Print publication:
- May 2022
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Background:
Many patients with mental health disorders become increasingly isolated at home due to anxiety about going outside. A cognitive perspective on this difficulty is that threat cognitions lead to the safety-seeking behavioural response of agoraphobic avoidance.
Aims:We sought to develop a brief questionnaire, suitable for research and clinical practice, to assess a wide range of cognitions likely to lead to agoraphobic avoidance. We also included two additional subscales assessing two types of safety-seeking defensive responses: anxious avoidance and within-situation safety behaviours.
Method:198 patients with psychosis and agoraphobic avoidance and 1947 non-clinical individuals completed the item pool and measures of agoraphobic avoidance, generalised anxiety, social anxiety, depression and paranoia. Factor analyses were used to derive the Oxford Cognitions and Defences Questionnaire (O-CDQ).
Results:The O-CDQ consists of three subscales: threat cognitions (14 items), anxious avoidance (11 items), and within-situation safety behaviours (8 items). Separate confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated a good model fit for all subscales. The cognitions subscale was significantly associated with agoraphobic avoidance (r = .672, p < .001), social anxiety (r = .617, p < .001), generalized anxiety (r = .746, p < .001), depression (r = .619, p < .001) and paranoia (r = .655, p < .001). Additionally, both the O-CDQ avoidance (r = .867, p < .001) and within-situation safety behaviours (r = .757, p < .001) subscales were highly correlated with agoraphobic avoidance. The O-CDQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (cognitions Cronbach’s alpha = .93, avoidance Cronbach’s alpha = .94, within-situation Cronbach’s alpha = .93) and test–re-test reliability (cognitions ICC = 0.88, avoidance ICC = 0.92, within-situation ICC = 0.89).
Conclusions:The O-CDQ, consisting of three separate scales, has excellent psychometric properties and may prove a helpful tool for understanding agoraphobic avoidance across mental health disorders.
The Oxford Agoraphobic Avoidance Scale
- Sinead Lambe, Jessica C. Bird, Bao Sheng Loe, Laina Rosebrock, Thomas Kabir, Ariane Petit, Sophie Mulhall, Lucy Jenner, Charlotte Aynsworth, Elizabeth Murphy, Julia Jones, Rosie Powling, Kate Chapman, Robert Dudley, Anthony Morrison, Eileen O. Regan, Ly-Mee Yu, David Clark, Felicity Waite, Daniel Freeman
-
- Journal:
- Psychological Medicine / Volume 53 / Issue 4 / March 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 23 August 2021, pp. 1233-1243
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Background
Agoraphobic avoidance of everyday situations is a common feature in many mental health disorders. Avoidance can be due to a variety of fears, including concerns about negative social evaluation, panicking, and harm from others. The result is inactivity and isolation. Behavioural avoidance tasks (BATs) provide an objective assessment of avoidance and in situ anxiety but are challenging to administer and lack standardisation. Our aim was to draw on the principles of BATs to develop a self-report measure of agoraphobia symptoms.
MethodThe scale was developed with 194 patients with agoraphobia in the context of psychosis, 427 individuals in the general population with high levels of agoraphobia, and 1094 individuals with low levels of agoraphobia. Factor analysis, item response theory, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used. Validity was assessed against a BAT, actigraphy data, and an existing agoraphobia measure. Test–retest reliability was assessed with 264 participants.
ResultsAn eight-item questionnaire with avoidance and distress response scales was developed. The avoidance and distress scales each had an excellent model fit and reliably assessed agoraphobic symptoms across the severity spectrum. All items were highly discriminative (avoidance: a = 1.24–5.43; distress: a = 1.60–5.48), indicating that small increases in agoraphobic symptoms led to a high probability of item endorsement. The scale demonstrated good internal reliability, test–retest reliability, and validity.
ConclusionsThe Oxford Agoraphobic Avoidance Scale has excellent psychometric properties. Clinical cut-offs and score ranges are provided. This precise assessment tool may help focus attention on the clinically important problem of agoraphobic avoidance.
9 - Impact Cratering of Mercury
- Edited by Sean C. Solomon, Larry R. Nittler, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington DC, Brian J. Anderson
-
- Book:
- Mercury
- Published online:
- 10 December 2018
- Print publication:
- 20 December 2018, pp 217-248
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Impact craters are the dominant landform on Mercury and range from the largest basins to the smallest young craters. Peak-ring basins are especially prevalent on Mercury, although basins of all forms are far undersaturated, probably the result of the extensive volcanic emplacement of intercrater plains and younger smooth plains between about 4.1 and 3.5 Ga. This chapter describes the geology of the two largest well-preserved basins, Caloris and Rembrandt, and the three smaller Raditladi, Rachmaninoff, and Mozart basins. We describe analyses of crater size–frequency distributions and relate them to populations of asteroid impactors (Late Heavy Bombardment in early epochs and the near-Earth asteroid population observable today during most of Mercury’s history), to secondary cratering, and to exogenic and endogenic processes that degrade and erase craters. Secondary cratering is more important on Mercury than on other solar system bodies and shaped much of the surface on kilometer and smaller scales, compromising our ability to use craters for relative and absolute age-dating of smaller geological units. Failure to find “vulcanoids” and satellites of Mercury suggests that such bodies played a negligible role in cratering Mercury. We describe an absolute cratering chronology for Mercury’s geological evolution as well as its uncertainties.
Contributors
-
- By Rose Teteki Abbey, K. C. Abraham, David Tuesday Adamo, LeRoy H. Aden, Efrain Agosto, Victor Aguilan, Gillian T. W. Ahlgren, Charanjit Kaur AjitSingh, Dorothy B E A Akoto, Giuseppe Alberigo, Daniel E. Albrecht, Ruth Albrecht, Daniel O. Aleshire, Urs Altermatt, Anand Amaladass, Michael Amaladoss, James N. Amanze, Lesley G. Anderson, Thomas C. Anderson, Victor Anderson, Hope S. Antone, María Pilar Aquino, Paula Arai, Victorio Araya Guillén, S. Wesley Ariarajah, Ellen T. Armour, Brett Gregory Armstrong, Atsuhiro Asano, Naim Stifan Ateek, Mahmoud Ayoub, John Alembillah Azumah, Mercedes L. García Bachmann, Irena Backus, J. Wayne Baker, Mieke Bal, Lewis V. Baldwin, William Barbieri, António Barbosa da Silva, David Basinger, Bolaji Olukemi Bateye, Oswald Bayer, Daniel H. Bays, Rosalie Beck, Nancy Elizabeth Bedford, Guy-Thomas Bedouelle, Chorbishop Seely Beggiani, Wolfgang Behringer, Christopher M. Bellitto, Byard Bennett, Harold V. Bennett, Teresa Berger, Miguel A. Bernad, Henley Bernard, Alan E. Bernstein, Jon L. Berquist, Johannes Beutler, Ana María Bidegain, Matthew P. Binkewicz, Jennifer Bird, Joseph Blenkinsopp, Dmytro Bondarenko, Paulo Bonfatti, Riet en Pim Bons-Storm, Jessica A. Boon, Marcus J. Borg, Mark Bosco, Peter C. Bouteneff, François Bovon, William D. Bowman, Paul S. Boyer, David Brakke, Richard E. Brantley, Marcus Braybrooke, Ian Breward, Ênio José da Costa Brito, Jewel Spears Brooker, Johannes Brosseder, Nicholas Canfield Read Brown, Robert F. Brown, Pamela K. Brubaker, Walter Brueggemann, Bishop Colin O. Buchanan, Stanley M. Burgess, Amy Nelson Burnett, J. Patout Burns, David B. Burrell, David Buttrick, James P. Byrd, Lavinia Byrne, Gerado Caetano, Marcos Caldas, Alkiviadis Calivas, William J. Callahan, Salvatore Calomino, Euan K. Cameron, William S. Campbell, Marcelo Ayres Camurça, Daniel F. Caner, Paul E. Capetz, Carlos F. Cardoza-Orlandi, Patrick W. Carey, Barbara Carvill, Hal Cauthron, Subhadra Mitra Channa, Mark D. Chapman, James H. Charlesworth, Kenneth R. Chase, Chen Zemin, Luciano Chianeque, Philip Chia Phin Yin, Francisca H. Chimhanda, Daniel Chiquete, John T. Chirban, Soobin Choi, Robert Choquette, Mita Choudhury, Gerald Christianson, John Chryssavgis, Sejong Chun, Esther Chung-Kim, Charles M. A. Clark, Elizabeth A. Clark, Sathianathan Clarke, Fred Cloud, John B. Cobb, W. Owen Cole, John A Coleman, John J. Collins, Sylvia Collins-Mayo, Paul K. Conkin, Beth A. Conklin, Sean Connolly, Demetrios J. Constantelos, Michael A. Conway, Paula M. Cooey, Austin Cooper, Michael L. Cooper-White, Pamela Cooper-White, L. William Countryman, Sérgio Coutinho, Pamela Couture, Shannon Craigo-Snell, James L. Crenshaw, David Crowner, Humberto Horacio Cucchetti, Lawrence S. Cunningham, Elizabeth Mason Currier, Emmanuel Cutrone, Mary L. Daniel, David D. Daniels, Robert Darden, Rolf Darge, Isaiah Dau, Jeffry C. Davis, Jane Dawson, Valentin Dedji, John W. de Gruchy, Paul DeHart, Wendy J. Deichmann Edwards, Miguel A. De La Torre, George E. Demacopoulos, Thomas de Mayo, Leah DeVun, Beatriz de Vasconcellos Dias, Dennis C. Dickerson, John M. Dillon, Luis Miguel Donatello, Igor Dorfmann-Lazarev, Susanna Drake, Jonathan A. Draper, N. Dreher Martin, Otto Dreydoppel, Angelyn Dries, A. J. Droge, Francis X. D'Sa, Marilyn Dunn, Nicole Wilkinson Duran, Rifaat Ebied, Mark J. Edwards, William H. Edwards, Leonard H. Ehrlich, Nancy L. Eiesland, Martin Elbel, J. Harold Ellens, Stephen Ellingson, Marvin M. Ellison, Robert Ellsberg, Jean Bethke Elshtain, Eldon Jay Epp, Peter C. Erb, Tassilo Erhardt, Maria Erling, Noel Leo Erskine, Gillian R. Evans, Virginia Fabella, Michael A. Fahey, Edward Farley, Margaret A. Farley, Wendy Farley, Robert Fastiggi, Seena Fazel, Duncan S. Ferguson, Helwar Figueroa, Paul Corby Finney, Kyriaki Karidoyanes FitzGerald, Thomas E. FitzGerald, John R. Fitzmier, Marie Therese Flanagan, Sabina Flanagan, Claude Flipo, Ronald B. Flowers, Carole Fontaine, David Ford, Mary Ford, Stephanie A. Ford, Jim Forest, William Franke, Robert M. Franklin, Ruth Franzén, Edward H. Friedman, Samuel Frouisou, Lorelei F. Fuchs, Jojo M. Fung, Inger Furseth, Richard R. Gaillardetz, Brandon Gallaher, China Galland, Mark Galli, Ismael García, Tharscisse Gatwa, Jean-Marie Gaudeul, Luis María Gavilanes del Castillo, Pavel L. Gavrilyuk, Volney P. Gay, Metropolitan Athanasios Geevargis, Kondothra M. George, Mary Gerhart, Simon Gikandi, Maurice Gilbert, Michael J. Gillgannon, Verónica Giménez Beliveau, Terryl Givens, Beth Glazier-McDonald, Philip Gleason, Menghun Goh, Brian Golding, Bishop Hilario M. Gomez, Michelle A. Gonzalez, Donald K. Gorrell, Roy Gottfried, Tamara Grdzelidze, Joel B. Green, Niels Henrik Gregersen, Cristina Grenholm, Herbert Griffiths, Eric W. Gritsch, Erich S. Gruen, Christoffer H. Grundmann, Paul H. Gundani, Jon P. Gunnemann, Petre Guran, Vidar L. Haanes, Jeremiah M. Hackett, Getatchew Haile, Douglas John Hall, Nicholas Hammond, Daphne Hampson, Jehu J. Hanciles, Barry Hankins, Jennifer Haraguchi, Stanley S. Harakas, Anthony John Harding, Conrad L. Harkins, J. William Harmless, Marjory Harper, Amir Harrak, Joel F. Harrington, Mark W. Harris, Susan Ashbrook Harvey, Van A. Harvey, R. Chris Hassel, Jione Havea, Daniel Hawk, Diana L. Hayes, Leslie Hayes, Priscilla Hayner, S. Mark Heim, Simo Heininen, Richard P. Heitzenrater, Eila Helander, David Hempton, Scott H. Hendrix, Jan-Olav Henriksen, Gina Hens-Piazza, Carter Heyward, Nicholas J. Higham, David Hilliard, Norman A. Hjelm, Peter C. Hodgson, Arthur Holder, M. Jan Holton, Dwight N. Hopkins, Ronnie Po-chia Hsia, Po-Ho Huang, James Hudnut-Beumler, Jennifer S. Hughes, Leonard M. Hummel, Mary E. Hunt, Laennec Hurbon, Mark Hutchinson, Susan E. Hylen, Mary Beth Ingham, H. Larry Ingle, Dale T. Irvin, Jon Isaak, Paul John Isaak, Ada María Isasi-Díaz, Hans Raun Iversen, Margaret C. Jacob, Arthur James, Maria Jansdotter-Samuelsson, David Jasper, Werner G. Jeanrond, Renée Jeffery, David Lyle Jeffrey, Theodore W. Jennings, David H. Jensen, Robin Margaret Jensen, David Jobling, Dale A. Johnson, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Maxwell E. Johnson, Sarah Johnson, Mark D. Johnston, F. Stanley Jones, James William Jones, John R. Jones, Alissa Jones Nelson, Inge Jonsson, Jan Joosten, Elizabeth Judd, Mulambya Peggy Kabonde, Robert Kaggwa, Sylvester Kahakwa, Isaac Kalimi, Ogbu U. Kalu, Eunice Kamaara, Wayne C. Kannaday, Musimbi Kanyoro, Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen, Frank Kaufmann, Léon Nguapitshi Kayongo, Richard Kearney, Alice A. Keefe, Ralph Keen, Catherine Keller, Anthony J. Kelly, Karen Kennelly, Kathi Lynn Kern, Fergus Kerr, Edward Kessler, George Kilcourse, Heup Young Kim, Kim Sung-Hae, Kim Yong-Bock, Kim Yung Suk, Richard King, Thomas M. King, Robert M. Kingdon, Ross Kinsler, Hans G. Kippenberg, Cheryl A. Kirk-Duggan, Clifton Kirkpatrick, Leonid Kishkovsky, Nadieszda Kizenko, Jeffrey Klaiber, Hans-Josef Klauck, Sidney Knight, Samuel Kobia, Robert Kolb, Karla Ann Koll, Heikki Kotila, Donald Kraybill, Philip D. W. Krey, Yves Krumenacker, Jeffrey Kah-Jin Kuan, Simanga R. Kumalo, Peter Kuzmic, Simon Shui-Man Kwan, Kwok Pui-lan, André LaCocque, Stephen E. Lahey, John Tsz Pang Lai, Emiel Lamberts, Armando Lampe, Craig Lampe, Beverly J. Lanzetta, Eve LaPlante, Lizette Larson-Miller, Ariel Bybee Laughton, Leonard Lawlor, Bentley Layton, Robin A. Leaver, Karen Lebacqz, Archie Chi Chung Lee, Marilyn J. Legge, Hervé LeGrand, D. L. LeMahieu, Raymond Lemieux, Bill J. Leonard, Ellen M. Leonard, Outi Leppä, Jean Lesaulnier, Nantawan Boonprasat Lewis, Henrietta Leyser, Alexei Lidov, Bernard Lightman, Paul Chang-Ha Lim, Carter Lindberg, Mark R. Lindsay, James R. Linville, James C. Livingston, Ann Loades, David Loades, Jean-Claude Loba-Mkole, Lo Lung Kwong, Wati Longchar, Eleazar López, David W. Lotz, Andrew Louth, Robin W. Lovin, William Luis, Frank D. Macchia, Diarmaid N. J. MacCulloch, Kirk R. MacGregor, Marjory A. MacLean, Donald MacLeod, Tomas S. Maddela, Inge Mager, Laurenti Magesa, David G. Maillu, Fortunato Mallimaci, Philip Mamalakis, Kä Mana, Ukachukwu Chris Manus, Herbert Robinson Marbury, Reuel Norman Marigza, Jacqueline Mariña, Antti Marjanen, Luiz C. L. Marques, Madipoane Masenya (ngwan'a Mphahlele), Caleb J. D. Maskell, Steve Mason, Thomas Massaro, Fernando Matamoros Ponce, András Máté-Tóth, Odair Pedroso Mateus, Dinis Matsolo, Fumitaka Matsuoka, John D'Arcy May, Yelena Mazour-Matusevich, Theodore Mbazumutima, John S. McClure, Christian McConnell, Lee Martin McDonald, Gary B. McGee, Thomas McGowan, Alister E. McGrath, Richard J. McGregor, John A. McGuckin, Maud Burnett McInerney, Elsie Anne McKee, Mary B. McKinley, James F. McMillan, Ernan McMullin, Kathleen E. McVey, M. Douglas Meeks, Monica Jyotsna Melanchthon, Ilie Melniciuc-Puica, Everett Mendoza, Raymond A. Mentzer, William W. Menzies, Ina Merdjanova, Franziska Metzger, Constant J. Mews, Marvin Meyer, Carol Meyers, Vasile Mihoc, Gunner Bjerg Mikkelsen, Maria Inêz de Castro Millen, Clyde Lee Miller, Bonnie J. Miller-McLemore, Alexander Mirkovic, Paul Misner, Nozomu Miyahira, R. W. L. Moberly, Gerald Moede, Aloo Osotsi Mojola, Sunanda Mongia, Rebeca Montemayor, James Moore, Roger E. Moore, Craig E. Morrison O.Carm, Jeffry H. Morrison, Keith Morrison, Wilson J. Moses, Tefetso Henry Mothibe, Mokgethi Motlhabi, Fulata Moyo, Henry Mugabe, Jesse Ndwiga Kanyua Mugambi, Peggy Mulambya-Kabonde, Robert Bruce Mullin, Pamela Mullins Reaves, Saskia Murk Jansen, Heleen L. Murre-Van den Berg, Augustine Musopole, Isaac M. T. Mwase, Philomena Mwaura, Cecilia Nahnfeldt, Anne Nasimiyu Wasike, Carmiña Navia Velasco, Thulani Ndlazi, Alexander Negrov, James B. Nelson, David G. Newcombe, Carol Newsom, Helen J. Nicholson, George W. E. Nickelsburg, Tatyana Nikolskaya, Damayanthi M. A. Niles, Bertil Nilsson, Nyambura Njoroge, Fidelis Nkomazana, Mary Beth Norton, Christian Nottmeier, Sonene Nyawo, Anthère Nzabatsinda, Edward T. Oakes, Gerald O'Collins, Daniel O'Connell, David W. Odell-Scott, Mercy Amba Oduyoye, Kathleen O'Grady, Oyeronke Olajubu, Thomas O'Loughlin, Dennis T. Olson, J. Steven O'Malley, Cephas N. Omenyo, Muriel Orevillo-Montenegro, César Augusto Ornellas Ramos, Agbonkhianmeghe E. Orobator, Kenan B. Osborne, Carolyn Osiek, Javier Otaola Montagne, Douglas F. Ottati, Anna May Say Pa, Irina Paert, Jerry G. Pankhurst, Aristotle Papanikolaou, Samuele F. Pardini, Stefano Parenti, Peter Paris, Sung Bae Park, Cristián G. Parker, Raquel Pastor, Joseph Pathrapankal, Daniel Patte, W. Brown Patterson, Clive Pearson, Keith F. Pecklers, Nancy Cardoso Pereira, David Horace Perkins, Pheme Perkins, Edward N. Peters, Rebecca Todd Peters, Bishop Yeznik Petrossian, Raymond Pfister, Peter C. Phan, Isabel Apawo Phiri, William S. F. Pickering, Derrick G. Pitard, William Elvis Plata, Zlatko Plese, John Plummer, James Newton Poling, Ronald Popivchak, Andrew Porter, Ute Possekel, James M. Powell, Enos Das Pradhan, Devadasan Premnath, Jaime Adrían Prieto Valladares, Anne Primavesi, Randall Prior, María Alicia Puente Lutteroth, Eduardo Guzmão Quadros, Albert Rabil, Laurent William Ramambason, Apolonio M. Ranche, Vololona Randriamanantena Andriamitandrina, Lawrence R. Rast, Paul L. Redditt, Adele Reinhartz, Rolf Rendtorff, Pål Repstad, James N. Rhodes, John K. Riches, Joerg Rieger, Sharon H. Ringe, Sandra Rios, Tyler Roberts, David M. Robinson, James M. Robinson, Joanne Maguire Robinson, Richard A. H. Robinson, Roy R. Robson, Jack B. Rogers, Maria Roginska, Sidney Rooy, Rev. Garnett Roper, Maria José Fontelas Rosado-Nunes, Andrew C. Ross, Stefan Rossbach, François Rossier, John D. Roth, John K. Roth, Phillip Rothwell, Richard E. Rubenstein, Rosemary Radford Ruether, Markku Ruotsila, John E. Rybolt, Risto Saarinen, John Saillant, Juan Sanchez, Wagner Lopes Sanchez, Hugo N. Santos, Gerhard Sauter, Gloria L. Schaab, Sandra M. Schneiders, Quentin J. Schultze, Fernando F. Segovia, Turid Karlsen Seim, Carsten Selch Jensen, Alan P. F. Sell, Frank C. Senn, Kent Davis Sensenig, Damían Setton, Bal Krishna Sharma, Carolyn J. Sharp, Thomas Sheehan, N. Gerald Shenk, Christian Sheppard, Charles Sherlock, Tabona Shoko, Walter B. Shurden, Marguerite Shuster, B. Mark Sietsema, Batara Sihombing, Neil Silberman, Clodomiro Siller, Samuel Silva-Gotay, Heikki Silvet, John K. Simmons, Hagith Sivan, James C. Skedros, Abraham Smith, Ashley A. Smith, Ted A. Smith, Daud Soesilo, Pia Søltoft, Choan-Seng (C. S.) Song, Kathryn Spink, Bryan Spinks, Eric O. Springsted, Nicolas Standaert, Brian Stanley, Glen H. Stassen, Karel Steenbrink, Stephen J. Stein, Andrea Sterk, Gregory E. Sterling, Columba Stewart, Jacques Stewart, Robert B. Stewart, Cynthia Stokes Brown, Ken Stone, Anne Stott, Elizabeth Stuart, Monya Stubbs, Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki, David Kwang-sun Suh, Scott W. Sunquist, Keith Suter, Douglas Sweeney, Charles H. Talbert, Shawqi N. Talia, Elsa Tamez, Joseph B. Tamney, Jonathan Y. Tan, Yak-Hwee Tan, Kathryn Tanner, Feiya Tao, Elizabeth S. Tapia, Aquiline Tarimo, Claire Taylor, Mark Lewis Taylor, Bishop Abba Samuel Wolde Tekestebirhan, Eugene TeSelle, M. Thomas Thangaraj, David R. Thomas, Andrew Thornley, Scott Thumma, Marcelo Timotheo da Costa, George E. “Tink” Tinker, Ola Tjørhom, Karen Jo Torjesen, Iain R. Torrance, Fernando Torres-Londoño, Archbishop Demetrios [Trakatellis], Marit Trelstad, Christine Trevett, Phyllis Trible, Johannes Tromp, Paul Turner, Robert G. Tuttle, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Peter Tyler, Anders Tyrberg, Justin Ukpong, Javier Ulloa, Camillus Umoh, Kristi Upson-Saia, Martina Urban, Monica Uribe, Elochukwu Eugene Uzukwu, Richard Vaggione, Gabriel Vahanian, Paul Valliere, T. J. Van Bavel, Steven Vanderputten, Peter Van der Veer, Huub Van de Sandt, Louis Van Tongeren, Luke A. Veronis, Noel Villalba, Ramón Vinke, Tim Vivian, David Voas, Elena Volkova, Katharina von Kellenbach, Elina Vuola, Timothy Wadkins, Elaine M. Wainwright, Randi Jones Walker, Dewey D. Wallace, Jerry Walls, Michael J. Walsh, Philip Walters, Janet Walton, Jonathan L. Walton, Wang Xiaochao, Patricia A. Ward, David Harrington Watt, Herold D. Weiss, Laurence L. Welborn, Sharon D. Welch, Timothy Wengert, Traci C. West, Merold Westphal, David Wetherell, Barbara Wheeler, Carolinne White, Jean-Paul Wiest, Frans Wijsen, Terry L. Wilder, Felix Wilfred, Rebecca Wilkin, Daniel H. Williams, D. Newell Williams, Michael A. Williams, Vincent L. Wimbush, Gabriele Winkler, Anders Winroth, Lauri Emílio Wirth, James A. Wiseman, Ebba Witt-Brattström, Teofil Wojciechowski, John Wolffe, Kenman L. Wong, Wong Wai Ching, Linda Woodhead, Wendy M. Wright, Rose Wu, Keith E. Yandell, Gale A. Yee, Viktor Yelensky, Yeo Khiok-Khng, Gustav K. K. Yeung, Angela Yiu, Amos Yong, Yong Ting Jin, You Bin, Youhanna Nessim Youssef, Eliana Yunes, Robert Michael Zaller, Valarie H. Ziegler, Barbara Brown Zikmund, Joyce Ann Zimmerman, Aurora Zlotnik, Zhuo Xinping
- Edited by Daniel Patte, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
-
- Book:
- The Cambridge Dictionary of Christianity
- Published online:
- 05 August 2012
- Print publication:
- 20 September 2010, pp xi-xliv
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
Divisions I & III WG: on Near Earth Objects
- David Morrison, Andrea Milani, Richard Binzel, Ted Bowell, Andrea Carusi, Clark Chapman, Alan Harris, Syuzo Isobe, Brian Marsden, Karri Muinonen, Steve Ostro, Victor Shor, Duncan Steel, Gonzalo Tancredi, Jana Ticha, Giovanni Valsecchi, Don Yeomans
-
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union / Volume 1 / Issue T26A / December 2005
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 December 2005, pp. 187-188
- Print publication:
- December 2005
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
The WGNEO, a Working Group of Divisions I and III, was formed in the early 1990s to coordinate study of Earth-approaching asteroids and comets (NEOs) and provide timely advice to the General Secretary and officers of the IAU on discovery of any objects that threaten collision with the Earth. Since then, the WGNEO has steadily grown, reflecting increasing international interest and concern over impacts, especially from asteroids (which dominate over comets in their risk to Earth). In this triennium, the WGNEO had a membership of 49 (including the Organizing Committee of 17 members), plus 10 consultants. The Chair is David Morrison (USA), Vice-Chair Andrea Milani (Italy), Secretary Richard Binzel (USA), and Past-Chair Andrea Carusi (Italy).
A long-term evaluation of fruiting phenology: importance of climate change
- Colin A. Chapman, Lauren J. Chapman, Thomas T. Struhsaker, Amy E. Zanne, Connie J. Clark, John R. Poulsen
-
- Journal:
- Journal of Tropical Ecology / Volume 21 / Issue 1 / January 2005
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 January 2005, pp. 31-45
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Within the last decade the study of phenology has taken on new importance because of its contribution to climate-change research. However, phenology data sets spanning many years are rare in the tropics, making it difficult to evaluate possible responses of tropical communities to climate change. Here we use two data sets (1970–1983 and 1990–2002) to describe the fruiting patterns of the tropical tree community in Kibale National Park, Uganda. To address variation in spatial patterns, we describe fruiting over 2–3 y among four sites each separated by 12–15 km. Presently, the Kibale region is receiving c. 300 mm more rain than it did at the start of the century, droughts are less frequent, the onset of the rainy season is earlier, and the average maximum monthly temperature is 3.5 °C hotter than it was 25 y ago. The 1990–2002 phenology data illustrated high temporal variability in the proportion of the populations fruiting. Interannual variation in community-wide fruit availability was also high; however, the proportion of trees that fruited has increased over the past 12+y. At the species level a variety of patterns were exhibited; however, a number of the most common species currently rarely fruit, and when they do, typically <4% of the individuals take part in fruiting events. Combining the data set from 1990 to 2002 with that from 1970 to 1983 for specific species again reveals an increase in the proportion of trees fruiting between 1990 and 2002; however, the proportion of the populations fruiting decreased during the earlier period. When one examines particular species over this whole period a variety of patterns are evident. For example, Pouteria altissima exhibited a relatively regular pattern of fruiting during the 1970s; however, it rarely fruited in the 1990s. Contrasting phenological patterns at four sites revealed that at the community level the fruiting patterns of only one of the six pair-wise site combinations were correlated. Relationships between rainfall and fruiting were variable among sites. Contrasting changes in fruiting patterns over the 30 y with differences among the four sites varying in rainfall, suggests that the changes observed in fruiting may be due to climate change. Responses to this climate change are likely complex and will vary among species. However, for some species, current conditions appear unsuitable for fruiting.
16 - Impacts and the public: communicating the nature of the impact hazard
-
- By David Morrison, NASA Ames Research Center, Clark R. Chapman, Southwest Research Institute, Duncan Steel, University of Salford, Richard P. Binzel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Edited by Michael J. S. Belton, Belton Space Exploration Initiatives, Thomas H. Morgan, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington DC, Nalin H. Samarasinha, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Donald K. Yeomans, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
-
- Book:
- Mitigation of Hazardous Comets and Asteroids
- Published online:
- 12 October 2009
- Print publication:
- 06 September 2004, pp 353-390
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
In the twenty-first century, we must consider the asteroid and comet impact hazard in a context in which citizens of many nations are apprehensive about hazards associated with foods, disease, accidents, natural disasters, terrorism, and war. The ways we respond psychologically to such threats to our lives and well-being, and the degrees to which we expect our societal institutions (both governmental and private) to respond, are not directly proportional to actuarial estimates of the causes of human mortality, nor to forecasts of likely economic consequences. Our concerns about particular hazards are often heavily influenced by other factors, and they vary from year to year. Citizens of different nations demonstrate different degrees of concern about risks in the modern world (for example, reactions to eating genetically modified food or living near a nuclear power plant). Yet one would hope that public officials would base decisions at least in part on the best information available about the risks and costs, and scientists have a responsibility to assist them to reach defensible conclusions.
Objective estimates of the potential damage due to asteroid impacts (consequences multiplied by risk) are within the range of other risks that governments often take very seriously (Morrison et al. 1994). Moreover, public interest is high, fueled by increasing discovery rates and the continuing interests of the international news media. In this chapter we consider the past, present, and future of interactions by scientists with the public and media on the subject of the impact hazard.
5 - What we know and don't know about surfaces of potentially hazardous small bodies
-
- By Clark R. Chapman, Southwest Research Institute
- Edited by Michael J. S. Belton, Belton Space Exploration Initiatives, Thomas H. Morgan, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington DC, Nalin H. Samarasinha, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Donald K. Yeomans, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
-
- Book:
- Mitigation of Hazardous Comets and Asteroids
- Published online:
- 12 October 2009
- Print publication:
- 06 September 2004, pp 104-112
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Introduction
One of the most fundamental aspects of mitigating an impact threat by moving an asteroid or comet involves physical interaction with the body. Whether one is bathing the body's surface with neutrons, zapping it with a laser or solar-reflected beam, bolting an ion thruster or mass driver onto the surface, or trying to penetrate the surface in order to implant a device below the surface, we need to understand the physical attributes of the surface and sub-surface. Of course, we would critically wish to understand the surface of the particular body that is, most unluckily, found to be headed for Earth impact – should that eventuality come to pass. But, in the event that we have relatively little warning time, it might behoove us to examine well in advance the potential range of small-body surface environments that we might have to deal with. It will improve our ability to design experiments and understand data concerning the particular body if we have evaluated, beforehand, the range of surface properties we might encounter and have specified the kinds of measurement techniques that will robustly determine the important parameters that we would want to know.
We already know, from meteorite falls, that asteroidal materials can range from strong nickel–iron alloy (of which most smaller crater-forming meteorites, like Canyon Diablo, are made) to mud-like materials (like the remnants of the Tagish Lake fireball event). But the diversity could be even greater, especially on the softer/weaker end of the spectrum, because the Earth's atmosphere filters out such materials.
Working Group on Near Earth Objects: (Groupe De Travail Pour les Objets Proches De La Terre)
- David Morrison, Andrea Milani, Richard Binzel, Mike A’Hearn, Mark Bailey, Carlo Blanco, Andrea Boattini, Ted Bowell, Andrea Carusi, Clark Chapman, Paul Chodas, Nikolaj Chernykh, Julio Fernández, Daniel Green, Gerhard Hahn, Alan Harris, Eleanor Helin, Syuzo Isobe, Claes-Ingvar Lagerkvist, Steve Larson, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd, Brian Marsden, Robert McMillan, Karri Muinonen, Syuichi Nakano, William Napier, Steven Ostro, Steven Pravdo, Hans Rickman, Hans Scholl, Ken Seidelmann, Peter Shelus, Viktor Shor, Maria Sokolskaya, Duncan Steel, Grant Stokes, Gonzalo Tancredi, David Tholen, Janá Tichá, Giovanni Valsecchi, Richard West, Gareth Williams, Iwan Williams, Makoto Yoshikawa, Don Yeomans, David Asher, Dave Balam, Mario Carpino, Steve Chesley, Chris Chyba, Victoria Garshnek, Scott Hudson, Leon Jaroff, Alain Maury, Jacqueline Mitton, Oliver Morton, Petr Pravec, David Rabinowitz, Geoff Sommer, Tim Spahr, Jonathan Tate, Miloš Tichẏ
-
- Journal:
- Transactions of the International Astronomical Union / Volume 25 / Issue 1 / 2002
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 25 April 2016, pp. 139-140
- Print publication:
- 2002
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
4 - Social ecology of Kanyawara chimpanzees: implications for understanding the costs of great ape groups
- Edited by William C. McGrew, Linda F. Marchant, Miami University, Toshisada Nishida, Kyoto University, Japan
- Foreword by Jane Goodall
- Afterword by Junichiro Itani
- Corporate Author Wenner-Gren Foundation
-
- Book:
- Great Ape Societies
- Published online:
- 04 August 2010
- Print publication:
- 28 July 1996, pp 45-57
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, and bonobos, Pan paniscus, differ greatly in their social relationships and psychology, as many chapters in this book show (e.g. Takahata et al., Chapter 11; de Waal, Chapter 12). Why they do so is not understood. Yet since these are the two closest relatives of humans, and since each species has a different set of similarities with humans, the question is especially important by virtue of its relevance to human behavior. Why, for instance, do humans and chimpanzees have similarly violent intergroup aggression? The answer will likely depend on understanding why bonobos do not.
In general, bonobos have more relaxed relationships than chimpanzees, with a more pervasive web of alliances or friendships linking community members, especially adult females. This set of differences is thought to depend crucially on the ecological costs of grouping. Thus, friendly social relationships among female bonobos are thought to be possible because their parties are relatively stable, with individuals rarely forced to be solitary. Equivalently friendly relationships among female chimpanzees, on the other hand, are prohibited because parties are regularly forced to fragment, as a result of feeding competition when fruits are scarce (Chapman et al., 1994). Over evolutionary time, such differences have led to differences in species psychology (e.g. Wrangham, 1993).
Resource-based sociality is the only framework so far proposed to explain the ultimate sources of behavioral differences between the two species.
Galileo observations of the impacts
-
- By Clark R. Chapman, Planetary Science Institute, 620 N. 6th Avenue, Tucson AZ 85705
- Edited by Keith S. Noll, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Harold A. Weaver, Applied Research Corporation, Landover, Maryland, Paul D. Feldman, The Johns Hopkins University
-
- Book:
- The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter
- Published online:
- 12 September 2009
- Print publication:
- 26 July 1996, pp 121-132
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Galileo observations in the UV, visible, and infrared uniquely characterize the luminous phenomena associated primarily with the early stages of the impacts of SL9 fragments—the bolide and fireball phases—because of the spacecraft's direct view of the impact sites. The single luminous events, typically 1 min in duration at near-IR wavelengths, are interpreted as initial bolide flashes in the stratosphere followed immediately by development of a fireball above the ammonia clouds, which subsequently rises, expands, and cools from ∼ 8000 K to ∼ 1000 K over the first minute. The brightnesses of the bolide phases were remarkably similar for disparate events, including L and N, which were among the biggest and smallest of the impacts as classified by Earth-based phenomena. Subsequent fireball brightnesses differ much more, suggesting that the similar-sized fragments were near the threshold for creating fireballs and large dark features on Jupiter's face. Both bolides and fireballs were much dimmer than had been predicted before the impacts, implying that impactor masses were small (∼0.5 km diameter). Galileo data clarify the physical interpretation of the “first precursor,” as observed from Earth: it probably represents a massive meteor storm accompanying the main fragment, peaking ∼10s before the fragment penetrates to the tropopause; hints of behind-the-limb luminous phenomena, recorded from Earth immediately following the peak of the first precursor, may be due to reflection of the late bolide/early fireball stages from comet debris very high in Jupiter's atmosphere.
Galileo observations of the impacts
- Clark R. Chapman
-
- Journal:
- International Astronomical Union Colloquium / Volume 156 / May 1996
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 August 2016, pp. 121-132
- Print publication:
- May 1996
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Galileo observations in the UV, visible, and infrared uniquely characterize the luminous phenomena associated primarily with the early stages of the impacts of SL9 fragments—the bolide and fireball phases—because of the spacecraft's direct view of the impact sites. The single luminous events, typically 1 min in duration at near-IR wavelengths, are interpreted as initial bolide flashes in the stratosphere followed immediately by development of a fireball above the ammonia clouds, which subsequently rises, expands, and cools from ∼ 8000 K to ∼ 1000 K over the first minute. The brightnesses of the bolide phases were remarkably similar for disparate events, including L and N, which were among the biggest and smallest of the impacts as classified by Earth-based phenomena. Subsequent fireball brightnesses differ much more, suggesting that the similar-sized fragments were near the threshold for creating fireballs and large dark features on Jupiter's face. Both bolides and fireballs were much dimmer than had been predicted before the impacts, implying that impactor masses were small (∼0.5km diameter). Galileo data clarify the physical interpretation of the “first precursor,” as observed from Earth: it probably represents a massive meteor storm accompanying the main fragment, peaking ∼10s before the fragment penetrates to the tropopause; hints of behind-the-limb luminous phenomena, recorded from Earth immediately following the peak of the first precursor, may be due to reflection of the late bolide/early fireball stages from comet debris very high in Jupiter's atmosphere.
The Galileo Encounters with Gaspra and IDA
- Clark R. Chapman
-
- Journal:
- Symposium - International Astronomical Union / Volume 160 / 1994
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 19 July 2016, pp. 357-365
- Print publication:
- 1994
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
The Galileo spacecraft encounters with 951 Gaspra and 243 Ida have provided the first close-up pictures and measurements of asteroids. These two small, S-type asteroids are both irregular in shape, confirming generalized pre-encounter interpretations from groundbased data. Gaspra is lightly cratered by small, fresh craters whereas Ida's surface is heavily covered by craters of all sizes and in all stages of degradation. Unless there are major differences in strength between these two bodies, Ida may be about 10 times older than Gaspra – approaching the age of the solar system. Both asteroids have grooves, although not as prominent as on Phobos. Ida has a population of boulders, particularly near its ends. While Ida seems to have a deep regolith, Gaspra is more nearly in a state of erosion, although there is evidence for an older megaregolith. The data are thus far not conclusive about the geophysical properties of these objects (e.g. whether they are rubble piles) and there are as yet no firm conclusions about how asteroid families are produced by catastrophic collisions. Interesting spectral data relevant to the S-type asteroid controversy (e.g. spatial variations on Gaspra) may lead to some useful generalizations after the remaining Ida data are returned and analyzed in spring 1994. Unexpected magnetic anomalies observed in the vicinities of both asteroids are being studied.
A Review of Spectrophotometric Studies of Asteroids*
- Clark R. Chapman, Torrence V. Johnson, Thomas B. McCord
-
- Journal:
- International Astronomical Union Colloquium / Volume 12 / 1971
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 12 April 2016, pp. 51-65
- Print publication:
- 1971
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
It has long been realized that studies of the colors of asteroids provide useful clues to their composition. However, only since the development of photoelectric photometry have measurements of asteroid colors proven to be reliable. Recently, with advances in sensors and data systems, it has become possible to measure precisely the spectral reflectivity curves of asteroids from 0.3 to 1.1 µm with higher spectral resolution than that of the UBV system.
Until recently, attempts to determine asteroid composition by comparing color indices for asteroids with spectral reflectivities or color indices for meteorites and terrestrial rocks have not been fruitful (Kitamura, 1959; Watson, 1938). It has been noted that the mean color indices for asteroids fall within the range for rocks and meteorites. However, there are far too many minerals for a one-dimensional characterization of asteroid color (color index) to suggest even a compositional class, let alone a specific composition. But when the full spectral reflectivity curve is well defined, for instance in the 24 narrowband interference filters we have been using, the measurements are considerably more diagnostic.